This page is licensed under Creative Commons under Attribution 4.0 International. Anyone can share content from this page, with attribution and link to College MatchPoint requested.
6 Costly Mistakes That Hurt UT Austin Applicants This Year
Every year, we study the applications of students who were offered admission to UT Austin and those who were not, and patterns begin to emerge. One of the most common pitfalls we saw this year was a lack of clear major alignment. Strong grades and rank mattered, but students who stood out showed sustained, intentional involvement connected to their intended field of study. Activities, coursework, leadership, even summer experiences told a coherent story about who they were becoming. When that story felt scattered or generic, even very strong students struggled in holistic review. If your student is dreaming of the Forty Acres, now is the time to ask a simple question. Does their academic and extracurricular profile clearly point toward the major they plan to pursue?
As we reviewed the Class of 2026 outcomes, six common pitfalls appeared again and again. If your student hopes to apply to UT in the coming years, these are worth paying close attention to.
1. Choosing a Major Based on “Ease of Entry”
Some students selected a first-choice major because they believed it would be easier to gain admission. The plan was to transfer later.
This strategy rarely works.
UT reads every part of the application through the lens of the first choice major. If coursework, activities, and essays do not align with that major, the application feels inconsistent. Readers can see when a student is trying to “game” the system.
Authentic alignment always outperforms tactical positioning.
2. A Contradictory Second Choice Major
UT allows students to list a second-choice major. That does not mean it should be unrelated.
We saw applications where the first choice was engineering and the second choice was government. Or business paired with environmental science, with no connecting story.
When the second-choice major contradicts the overall narrative, it weakens the application.
The strongest applications told one cohesive story, even across multiple major options.
3. The Late Stage Pivot
Perhaps the most common issue this year was the junior spring pivot.
A student decided late in 11th grade to apply to a highly selective major such as engineering, business, or computer science. They added one summer program, maybe joined one club, and hoped it would be enough.
It wasn’t.
UT rewards progression over time. Readers are looking for evidence of preparation that stretches across years, not months.
Interest discovered late is not a problem. But attempting to build depth too quickly is.
4. Misaligned Academic Signals
Another pattern we saw was strong students whose transcripts did not support their intended major.
For example:
A business applicant without calculus.
An engineering applicant without advanced physics.
A STEM applicant with average math testing relative to major expectations.
UT does not reward taking every advanced class available. It rewards taking the right advanced classes.
This year reinforced that subject major alignment matters deeply.
5. An Expanded Resume That Listed Activities Instead of Showing Growth
UT’s expanded resume is one of the most powerful parts of the application. It is also one of the most misunderstood.
Some students treated it like a standard one page resume. They listed clubs, roles, and hours.
The students who were admitted used the expanded resume to demonstrate progression.
They showed how curiosity led to involvement, how involvement led to initiative, and how initiative led to impact.
Same activities. Different storytelling.
When the resume showed participation without reflection or growth, the application felt flat.
6. Inconsistent Storytelling Across the Application
The strongest UT applications this year were cohesive.
Transcript.
Activities.
Essays.
Letters of recommendation.
All pointed in the same direction.
In weaker applications, those pieces contradicted each other. A student wrote passionately about wanting to study policy, but their coursework and activities focused entirely on business. Or their recommendation letter emphasized traits unrelated to the major they selected.
In a cycle this competitive, inconsistency creates doubt.
The Big Takeaway
The students admitted this year were not perfect.
They were aligned.
UT Austin is evaluating readiness for a specific major, demonstrated over time through academic preparation, initiative, and meaningful growth.
The good news for families is this.
Every one of these pitfalls is preventable.
With intentional course planning, thoughtful summer experiences, aligned activities, and strategic storytelling, students can build a strong and coherent case for admission.
If UT Austin is on your student’s list, now is the time to ask one critical question:
Does every part of their story point in the same direction?
Clarity early reduces stress later.